Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Melby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1927No. Nos. 26,082, 26,083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Two actions by the commissioner of banks as the receiver of an insolvent state bank for recovery on promissory notes of the defendants held by the bank at the time of its insolvency. The one defense averred by the answers was that defendants should have the right to set off the amount of their liability as sureties of the bank on a depository bond to the county of Pennington. The appeal in each case is from an order sustaining a general demurrer to the answer. It is immaterial that the amount of defendant’s liability as surety has not yet been ascertained or that he has not paid it, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Veigel v. ConverseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickenson v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Turner v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API