Legal Opinion

Michaels v. Hart

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1924No. 11,867PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, C. J.

Samuel Templin died intestate September 23, 1923. Three days later appellant was appointed administrator of decedent’s estate, and qualified as such. Thereafter, on September 29, 1923, in a proceeding instituted pursuant to §23 of the Decedents’ Estates Act (§2245 R. S. 1881, §2762 Burns 1914), the letters of administration previously issued to appellant were revoked, appellant removed, and appellee appointed in his *366stead. Appellee immediately accepted the trust, qualified and entered upon his duties. From the court’s order, this appeal is prosecuted.

In the assignment of errors, the parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. EddingfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. In re Estate of MedburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. GillettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Tutorship of Minor, OsbornSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. RUSSELL, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC. v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Weiland v. ScheuchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API