Legal Opinion
In Re Consolidated Electric & Gas Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 10, 1944No. 382PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Securities and Exchange Commission applies under Sec. 11(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k (e), for approval of a certain plan of Consolidated Electric and Gas Company 1 as fair, equitable and appropriate to effectuate the provisions of Sec. 11(b) of the Act. Harris Trust and Savings Bank, of Chicago, Illinois, Trustee under an indenture securing certain bonds which have been assumed by Consolidated, opposes court approval on the ground that the plan (a) is not “fair and equitable”, (b) not “necessary”, and (c) is not a “plan” under…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SchubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Continental Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- In Re United Gas CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- In re Engineers Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- In re Engineers Public Service Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.