In re General Equity Rule 75
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In tbe matter of General Equity Rule 75 and Rule IS for the Sixth Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
PlXR CURIAM.
Motions recently decided and others now pending involving these rules justify a formal statement of our conclusions.
[1,2] Rule 75 fixes no time within which the statement of evidence must be settled and filed in order to “become a part of the record for the purposes of the appeal.” Undoubtedly, the better practice is to complete this step before claiming, or, at least, before perfecting the appeal, and if the term expires before the final statement of evidence is filed, to enter an order carrying this matter into the next term; but where appeals are required within 30 days, or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. GlinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Sussex Land & Live Stock Co. v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Struett v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Garland v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.