Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Glinn
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio ; John E. Sater, judge. Action at law by Annie B. Glinn, administratrix of Hugh A. Mor-ford, deceased, against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Eouis Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. On motion to dismiss and to strike the bill of exceptions from the files.
1Per curiam
Motion is made to dismiss and to strike the bill of exceptions from the files because not settled in accordance with rule 10 of this court (202 Fed. vii, 118 C. C. A. ix), promulgated March 15, 1913, which requires that the testimony of a witness be stated only in narrative form, except that, “if either party desires it and the judge so directs, any part of the testimony shall be reproduced in the exact words of the witness.” All of the testimony taken on the trial is included in the bill by question and answer. The salutary purpose of the rule is obvious. Only so much of the testimony should…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chesbrough v. WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re General Equity Rule 75Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914