Boruch v. State ex rel. Halikowski
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge:
¶ 1 This appeal arises out of the superior court’s dismissal of a complaint filed by homeowners and renters in three Mesa subdivisions to enjoin the City of Mesa and the State, through the Arizona Department of Transportation (“ADOT”), from diverting and channeling excess storm water onto their properties. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-1802 (2016) precludes the superior court from granting the requested injunctive *614relief. Because A.R.S. § 12-1802 does not bar the injunctive relief requested in the complaint, we…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Battery Council International, Respondents-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Az Public Integrity v. Adrian FontesArizona Supreme Court · 2020