Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berger v. New York State Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1992Published

1Dissent

Levine, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. In focusing exclusively on the language of modifier "-62” in the "General Information and Rules” (hereinafter general rules) of the radiology section of the Medicaid Management Information System (hereinafter MMIS) Provider Manual, the majority, in our view, misses the point of defendant’s rationale for applying the -62 modifier to plaintiffs charges for multiple sonograms performed on the same patient during a single visit. The applicable provision is rule 3 of the general rules of the radiology section of the MMIS Provider Manual. Rule 3…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StanisicSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Johnson v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API