Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2003No. 03CA0595Published

1Dissent

Judge GRAHAM

dissenting.

In my view, the Panel correctly applied Colorado law in concluding “that this limited evidence fails to establish that the working conditions were objectively unsatisfactory based on the factors enumerated in the statute or other comparable considerations.” The Panel ruled that “working between 56 and 63 hours per week does not, per se, constitute ‘unsatisfactory working conditions.’ ” I believe that, as a practical result, the majority’s opinion establishes such a rule and rejects outright the holding of another division of this court in Arias v. Indus. Appeals Office,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Samaritan Institute v. Prince-WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Arias v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Chris Crazy Trader, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API