Legal Opinion

Gearhart v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1989No. 16-86-01912; CA A45060PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*603ROSSMAN, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendants. We affirm.

Plaintiff was a hearings officer for Employment Division from November, 1976, until April, 1984, when she was discharged for “insubordinate behavior, failure to afford a fair hearing, and lack of professional conduct.” She then brought this action for wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress. After she presented her evidence, defendants moved to dismiss both of her claims under ORCP 54B(2).1 The trial court granted defendants’ motion and entered a judgment which, because it did not recite that it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In re the Marriage of CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Steenson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Lavigne v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Elliott v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. In re the Marriage of DillardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Gordineer v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Jensen v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API