Legal Opinion

Breakell v. 3M Company

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 16, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00583Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ADAM M. BREAKELL, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:19-cv-583 (VAB) 3M COMPANY, et. al., Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND Adam Breakell has brought claims for products liability, fraud, and premises liability in Connecticut Superior Court for monetary and punitive damages, costs, and attorney’s fees from injuries allegedly suffered through exposure to certain asbestos products. Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 1-1 (“Underlying Compl.”). Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (collectively “Johnson & Johnson”), defendants in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 919, Afl-Cio v. Centermark Properties Meriden Square, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Michael A. Lupo v. Human Affairs International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Roy A. Somlyo v. J. Lu-Rob Enterprises, Inc. And Louis G. BondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API