Legal Opinion

Bird v. Thanhouser

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 13, 1911No. Gen. No. 15,394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John W. Houston, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

The judgment involved in this writ of error, which was for $400 and costs, against the plaintiff in error in favor of defendant in error, must be reversed and the cause remanded for errors by the court below in the rulings on evidence.

The issues in the case turned on a contract made, if made at all, by a telegram sent by Bird (plaintiff below) to Thanhouser (defendant below) on or about August 24, 1908, and by the answer thereto by telegram of Thanhouser to Bird of August 25th. Two preceding telegrams between the parties have a bearing also on the case, and the statement of the material…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. J. B. Lyon & Co. v. Culbertson, Blair & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. FoulksIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Havana Press Drill Co. v. AshurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Winslow v. NewlanIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Rhodes v. AshurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schultz v. RichieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Allan v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API