Legal Opinion

Christian v. Lapidus

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1992PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this case of first impression, we must decide whether abandonment of a civil action constitutes a final, favorable termination so as to commence the running of the statute of limitation for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted summary judgment for Defendants, finding Plaintiffs’ suit time-barred. The Court of Appeals affirmed. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

On April 15, 1986, Defendants Charles Lapidus and the David King Conservator-ship filed a complaint against Plaintiffs Harold and Sue Christian, among others, in the United States District…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. McBurney v. AldrichCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. Lewis v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sinnott v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Scheibler v. SteinburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Cult Awareness Network v. Church of Scientology InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Roberts v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Thomas Hill, Howard McPherson Individually v. Frank White Bettie White John Vosberg Lawrence D. Wilson, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Parrish v. MarquisTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Spurlock v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API