Christian v. Lapidus
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
In this case of first impression, we must decide whether abandonment of a civil action constitutes a final, favorable termination so as to commence the running of the statute of limitation for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted summary judgment for Defendants, finding Plaintiffs’ suit time-barred. The Court of Appeals affirmed. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
On April 15, 1986, Defendants Charles Lapidus and the David King Conservator-ship filed a complaint against Plaintiffs Harold and Sue Christian, among others, in the United States District…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- McBurney v. AldrichCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Lewis v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Sinnott v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Scheibler v. SteinburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Cult Awareness Network v. Church of Scientology InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Roberts v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Thomas Hill, Howard McPherson Individually v. Frank White Bettie White John Vosberg Lawrence D. Wilson, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Parrish v. MarquisTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Spurlock v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.