Wright v. Howe
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. C. Loofbourow, Judge. Action by S. B. Wright against Richard Howe and Frank Howe, partners under the firm and style name of Murray Coal & Lumber Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendants to recover the value of four horses and damages for an injury to a fifth horse. It is, in substance, alleged in the complaint that the death of the four horses and the injury to the fifth were caused through the wrongful acts of the defendants, as will hereinafter appear. Defendants’ answer was, in effect, a general denial.
There is a preliminary question arising upon a motion of the defendants to be disposed of first. After the ease had been pending for about three years the defendants moved to dismiss the action, “for the reason that the plaintiff herein has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- French v. ViningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Coyle and Smith v. BaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Provost v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Martin v. AshMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by14 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
- Ellis v. LindmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Kujich v. LillieMontana Supreme Court · 1953
- Bock v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Department of Social Services v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.