Legal Opinion

Dublin Veneer Co. v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 8, 1934No. Nos. 9857, 9858, 9859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The assignment of error contained in the first special ground of the motion for new trial is that the court erred in consolidating the suit in the city court of Dublin with the suits pending in the superior court, for the reason that the parties were different, the pleadings and relief prayed for were different, and the relief afforded in the city court was complete, and it was not necessary or proper to consolidate said suit with the pending suits in this court when further action thereon had been stayed by order of this court. We are of the opinion that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Sutton v. McLeodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  3. Lewis v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Tarpley v. CorputtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  5. Logan & Atkinson v. Mechanic's BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGill v. DowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Pickens Investment Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Baker v. Moultrie Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Walton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. McGill v. DowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API