State v. Gooder
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentBurch, J.
I regret that I am unable to agree with my colleagues in this case. As late as July, 1928, all members of the court as now constituted, except Roberts, J., reaffirmed the prior rule of this state and said: “Having therefore, taken a position which is in accord with the decisions of the great majority of states, and which is approved, at least in some of its parts, by federal decisions, we would not now recede from that position, unless convinced: that such position was erroneous.” State v. Hoffman, 53 S. D. 182, 187, 220 N. W. 615, 617. Yet, when we examine the reasons for the change in our…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State v. FahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928