Legal Opinion

Camero v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 21, 2002No. A02A1175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Santos Camero guilty of felony theft by taking: Camero appeals his conviction, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial court’s admission of similar transaction evidence, its failure to suppress his statement to police, and the court’s ruling concerning a comment made by the prosecutor during closing argument. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. Viewed in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, 1 the evidence showed that Camero’s conviction stemmed from a drug deal in which he was supposed to sell 500 Ecstasy pills. The deal was set up by an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Parham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Dudley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Toledo Junius Bradford, Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API