Parham v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Lena Parham appeals her conviction of felony theft by taking, contending (1) the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction; (2) all jurors should have been disqualified for having an interest in the outcome of the case, or venue should have been changed; and (3) certain evidence was improperly admitted. Discerning no error, we affirm.

1. Parham first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the appellant no longer…