Legal Opinion

Joseph Liebling Inc. v. Tabb & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 7, 1923No. 13803, 13804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

C. L. Tabb & Company, a copartnership, were sued on open account for the purchase price of certain furs. They denied owing the account, and ¡deaded that they had not purchased any goods from the plaintiff. A verdict was rendered for the defendants. The plaintiff excepts to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based on the usual general grounds and on alleged errors in the charge of the court. By cross-bill of exceptions the defendants also complain of the charge.

The evidence for the plaintiff showed that the goods were sold on open account. The defendants’ contention is best shown by…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howard v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Blaylock v. Walker County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Kiser v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Gardner v. FleetwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  5. Guggenheimer & Co. v. LevinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API