Dobson v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eose Smith, J.
The basic question in this case is whether our statutes empower the Oil and Gas Commission to compel the unitization of an entire oil and gas field. An area is said to be unitized when various ownerships are treated as a unit in the production of oil and gas. In the usual case the owners of several small contiguous tracts, totaling perhaps forty acres, agree that a single well shall be drilled in the unitized area and that all the owners shall share proportionately in the oil and gas, regardless of whose land happens to be the situs of the well. In this case the principle of unitization has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turner v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Dunavant v. FieldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Western Gulf Oil Co. v. Superior Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by21 opinions
- Superior Oil Co. v. FOOTEMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Ark. Oil & Gas Comm'n v. HurdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Smith v. KapplerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Republic Natural Gas Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- The CALIFORNIA CO. v. BrittMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.