Legal Opinion
People v. Zinke
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. McLaughlin, J.
The court is called upon to decide whether a general part*464ner may ever be convicted of stealing funds held by a limited partnership.
Philip W. Zinke, the. sole general partner1 of the SIN I Limited Partnership, was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) for embezzling $1,050,000 in mid-1984 from SIN I.
At the end of the People’s case and again at the close of the entire evidence, defendant moved for trial orders of dismissal (CPL 290.10 [1]). The court reserved decision (People v Brown, 40…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lanier v. BowdoinNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tri-Growth Centre City, Ltd. v. Silldorf, BurdmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. McManusNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. ZinkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989