Krenik v. Westerman

Defendant’s contention is that plaintiff’s counsel should not have made statements from which it might be inferred that there Avere some things about the taking of the statements Avhick Avere reprehensible. But all of this Avas provoked by the remarks of defendant’s counsel, covering several pages of the record, that the taking of the statements was entirely proper and that it Avas misconduct for plaintiff’s counsel to contend to the contrary. Illustrative remarks of defendant’s counsel are:

Mr. Donnelly: “I think I have a right to read this in my argument to the jury, the Swanson case,…