Legal Opinion

State v. Patchen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1913No. 2079PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; T. F. Moran, Judge. Charles Patchen -and James Burke were convicted of the crime of burglary, and they appeal. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*511By the Court,

McCarran, J.:

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Second judicial district court and from the order of that court denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. Appellants were convicted of burglary in the first degree, after having been tried on an indictment, the charging part of which reads as follows:

"That said defendants on the 10th day of March, A. D. 1913, or thereabouts, and before the finding of this indictment,- at and within said county of Washoe, State of Nevada, did then and there, wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and burglariously enter that certain store…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. State v. MandichNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. SimpsonNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BullIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Luther M. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. White v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Truman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API