Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cal Dykstra Equipment Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 24, 1999No. 98-425PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to VR.A.E 5(b)(1), of the superior court’s decision to deny the motion of defendant, Cal Dykstra Equipment Co., to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff Keith E. Brown, d/b/a Precision Crane Service, a Vermont resident, brought suit against defendant, a Wisconsin corporation, for fraud stemming from the sale of a crane. Defendant moved to dismiss, arguing that its contacts with Vermont were insufficient to allow jurisdiction over it in Vermont courts. The superior court ruled that defendant’s contacts were .sufficient to support…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Northern Aircraft, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Dall v. KaylorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Schwartz v. FrankenhoffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northern Security Insurance Co. v. Mitec Electronics, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Havill v. Woodstock Soapstone Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. Bartus v. Owl's NestVermont Superior Court · 2005
  4. Escano v. Pro Custom Solar, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2018
  5. Escano v. Pro Custom Solar, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API