Legal Opinion
Todd Dry Dock & Construction Corp. v. Sumner Iron Works
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1923No. 3951PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The Urgency Deficiencies Appropriation Act of June 15, 1917 (40 Stat. 182 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115Viod]), provides, in part, as follows:
“The President is hereby authorized and empowered, within the limits ■of the" amounts herein authorized—'
“(a) To place an order with any person for such ships or material as the necessities of the government, to be determined by the President, may *218require during the period of the war and which.are of the nature, kind and quantity usually produced or capable of being produced by such person.
“(b) To modify,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Meyer Scale & Hardware Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1922
- Duesenberg Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buffalo Union Furnace Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Rumsey Mfg. Corp. v. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Russell Wheel & Foundry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Virginia Bridge & Iron Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLouthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.