Legal Opinion
Glover v. SEPTA
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 2002PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JUDGE FRIEDMAN.
Bernice Glover (Glover) appeals from two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court): a March 20, 2001 order denying her Motion for Leave of Court to File an Amended Complaint (Motion to Amend); and a March 27, 2001 order granting the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s (Commonwealth) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. We affirm both orders.
On November 6, 2000, Glover commenced a civil action by filing a complaint. In the complaint, Glover alleges that, on November 11, 1998, while disembarking from a Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of Gasbarini v. Medical Center of Beaver County, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Tork-Hiis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Hoare v. BELL TELEPHONE CO. OF PENN.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Taylor v. Humble Oil and Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- City of Philadelphia v. SpencerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brickman Group, Ltd. v. CGU Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Piehl v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ballroom, LLC v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- PILCHESKY v. DohertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Piehl v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.