Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Citizens State Bank

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1918No. 922Published

Appeal from District Court of Sheridan County; Hon. E. C. Raymond, Judge. Action by Herman L. Hahn against the Citizens State Bank and T. C. Diers. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals. Heard on motion to dismiss the appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court of Sheridan County; Hon. E. C. Raymond, Judge. Action by Herman L. Hahn against the Citizens State Bank and T. C. Diers. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals. Heard on motion to dismiss the appeal. An examination of the record shows that appellant has failed to comply with the requirements of the appeal act in two particulars, viz.: (a) Failed to comply with Section 2 as to the service of notice upon respondents within ten days from entry of judgment, and (b) failed to serve respondents and file with the clerk specifications of error within ten days after…

1Opinion

on petition eor rehearing.

Potter, Chiee Justice.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause having been sustained (see 171 Pac. 889), the appellant has filed-a petition for rehearing. The questions involved in the motion were very carefully considered and we see no reason for a different conclusion. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that the record failed to show that a judgment had been entered in the cause, and therefore that the.notice of appeal was insufficient to give.this court jurisdiction. The *486only showing of a judgment by the record, as stated in the former opinion, was a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Royal Insurance Co. v. Walker Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Royal Insurance v. Walker Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McCague Investment Co. v. MallinWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  5. McCague Investment Co. v. MallinWyoming Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API