Legal Opinion

Clark-Jewell-Wells Co. v. Tolsma

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1908No. Docket No. 107Published

Appeal from Kent; Perkins, J. Judgment creditor’s bill by the Clark-Jewell-Wells Company against William Tolsma and others. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The complainant, a judgment creditor of William Tolsma and John Knottnerus, filed the bill in this cause to reach an interest in a land contract which it claims that they received from the vendor in the land contract for their stock and good will, together with some cash. By way of defense they claim that the interest in the land contract (which was conveyed through a deed of the land), went to Tolsma’s wife and the mother of *562Knottnerus, in payment of certain debts, viz., $500 to Mrs. Knottnerus and $632 to Mrs. Tolsma, incurred by the copartnership at the time they became copartners, for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Heineman v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Nordlinger v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Cribb v. MorseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Jackson Bank v. DurfeyMississippi Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API