Nicolet Instrument Corporation v. Lindquist & Vennum
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
Nicolet Instrument Corporation brought a diversity suit for legal malpractice against its former counsel, Lindquist & Vennum. The district judge granted summary judgment for the law firm on the ground that Nicolet had failed to estabhsh a causal connection between its loss and the law firm’s alleged neghgence. Wisconsin law governs the substantive issues.
Nicolet had a wholly owned subsidiary named “Nicolet Zeta Corp.” that made computer graphics equipment, and in 1982 Nico-let leased a building in California for Zeta to occupy. The lease was for 10 years from the date of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zazu Designs, a Partnership v. L'oreal, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Phillip F. Winskunas v. James G. Birnbaum and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Schiller & Schmidt, Incorporated v. Nordisco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Olympia Equipment Leasing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Speakers of Sport, Inc. v. Proserv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Gecker v. Estate of Flynn (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Jones Motor Company, Inc., and Protective Insurance Company v. Holtkamp, Liese, Beckemeier & Childress, P.C., and Paul B. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Transcraft, Inc. v. Galvin, Stalmack, Kirschner & ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Chronister Oil Company v. Unocal Refining and Marketing (Union Oil Company of California)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.