Barkley v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHood, J.
This is an action for declaratory judgment1 concerning the duty of defendant, the City of Detroit, to provide legal counsel to police officers being sued for injuries allegedly inflicted by the officers during the performance of their official duties. Plaintiffs, who are all police officers and members of the Detroit Police Officers Association (dpoa), and the City of Detroit were named as defendants in nine separate civil suits that alleged various acts of police misconduct. At issue is whether ethical considerations prevent attorneys from the city’s law department from fulfilling the city’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atlanta International Insurance v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. DoyleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Olitkowski v. St. Casimir's Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Detroit News, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- BD. OF TRUSTEES POLICE & FIREMEN RET. SYS. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Evans & Luptak, PLC v. LizzaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Watts v. PolaczykMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- El Camino Resources, Ltd. v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
- City of Kalamazoo v. Michigan Disposal Service Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.