Legal Opinion

In re: Toyota Hybrid Brake Litigation

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided February 3, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00127Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION IN RE: TOYOTA HYBRID BRAKE § LITIGATION § § Consolidated Case No. 4:20-CV-127 § Judge Mazzant § MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendants Toyota Motor Corporation,1 Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss or Stay Based on the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction (Dkt. #40). Having considered the Motion, the relevant pleadings, and the arguments of counsel, the Court finds…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh, Acting Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Elam v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API