Legal Opinion

Jones v. Marshall

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 8, 1974No. Civ. 13811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for the death of Dennis Jones that has been brought by his father as administrator of his estate. The defendant, Officer Keith Marshall of the West Hartford Police Department, who shot and killed Jones, is alleged thereby to have deprived the decedent of his civil rights under color of state law. 1 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1970). Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) (1970). The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment based upon the following basic facts to which they have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Johnson v. GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Robert Leon Jenkins, a Minor, by His Mother and Next Friend, Roberta B. Jenkins v. F. W. AverettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flozell Jones, Administrator of the Estate of Dennis Jones v. Keith MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Smith v. WicklineDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API