Legal Opinion

Barton-Parker Manufacturing Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1905No. Nos. 14,571—(71)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Big Stone county to recover $180 for goods sold upon a contract executed in defendant’s behalf by an employee. Defendant repudiated the contract as unauthorized. The case was tried before Flaherty, J., who directed a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The facts in this case are as follows: Defendant was at the time-alleged in the complaint engaged in a general retail mercantile business-at Correll, a small town in Big Stone county, of this state. The stock consisted of groceries, dry goods and various notions; but he had’ never carried a line of jewelry. Defendant also operated an elevator for the storage and handling of grain. At the time in question defendant had in his employ a clerk named Farnham, who was designated on his letterheads and other advertising matter as general manager of the store; and as a matter of fact he exercised…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbia Mill Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Best v. KreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Truck Crane Service Co. v. Barr-Nelson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Winter v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Sinclair v. Investors SyndicateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Capp Seville, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. (In Re Northwest Airlines Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Winter v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API