Legal Opinion

Deangelus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1993No. 91-02947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges the trial court’s order imposing restitution in the amount of $95,172.23. We affirm the order imposing restitution but reverse the amount.

*1195After a jury trial, the appellant was convicted of driving under the influence. Appellant challenges both the imposition of restitution and the amount. We find no merit to her contention that restitution was improperly imposed and we affirm that portion of the sentence imposing restitution. However, because the appellant met her burden and established by the preponderance of the evidence her inability to pay the amount of $95,172.23 we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Medina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Bautista v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Crosby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API