Legal Opinion
Crosby v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 27, 1994No. 93-01945PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
637 So.2d 341 (1994)
Blaine CROSBY and Scott Crosby, Appellants,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-01945.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 27, 1994.
Mark Lipinski, Bradenton, for appellants.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.
Blaine and Scott Crosby challenge the amount of restitution the lower court imposed after their pleas of nolo contendere to grand theft. They assert that the trial court erred in determining the amount of each victim's loss and in setting a restitution…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Morel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- House v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Touchton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Bautista v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- L.R.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Ritch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Strickland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.