Legal Opinion

Holland v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. Docket No. 16537-12LUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID EDGAR HOLLAND, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Holland v. Comm'r

Docket No. 16537-12L

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2013-205; 2013 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 212; 106 T.C.M. (CCH) 220;

August 29, 2013, Filed

An appropriate order will be issued granting respondent's motion, and decision will be entered for respondent.

David Edgar Holland, Pro se.

Jonathan E. Behrens, for respondent.

RUWE, Judge.

RUWE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUWE, Judge: This matter is before the Court on respondent's motion for summary judgment (motion) pursuant to Rule 121. 1 Respondent contends that no genuine…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  3. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. Lunsford v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API