Legal Opinion

Wright v. Sas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1947No. [No. 48, October Term, 1946]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

These are appeals (Act of 1945, Ch. 702, Art. 42, Sec. 3 C) from orders releasing petitioners (appellees) on habeas corpus. Petitioners had been convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore of “taking and carrying away, out of the custody and use” of the owner, an automobile, in violation of Section 397 of Article 27, and had been sentenced to three years imprisonment. The ground of release was that Section 397 of Article 27 (Act of 1880, Ch. 164, as amended by Act of 1892, Ch. 88 and Act of 1918, Ch. 422) had been repealed by implication by the Act of 1943, Ch. 1007 (enacting Article 66%),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  2. Bailey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Anello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API