Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1996No. S-95-019PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C.J.

We agreed to the State’s petition for further review to resolve the disagreement between two decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals. At issue are the Court of Appeals’ decisions in State v. Martinez, 4 Neb. App. 192, 541 N.W.2d 406 (1995), and State v. Quick, 1 Neb. App. 756, 511 N.W.2d 168 (1993).

In the information against Martinez, it was alleged that a first degree sexual assault against Matthew P. occurred “between July 1, 1991 and June 18, 1994.” In Martinez, the Court of Appeals relied on Bartell v. United States, 227 U.S. 427, 431, 33 S. Ct. 383, 57 L. Ed. 583 (1913), wherein the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bartell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State v. PiskorskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MartinezNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. LodingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. SamayoaNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. HaasNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  4. People v. WilhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. FurreyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API