Legal Opinion

State v. . Garrigues

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1795PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The rule as laid down in 3 Co. Inst., 110, and 1 Inst., 227, is general and without exception that a jury in a capital case cannot be discharged without giving a verdict. Afterwards, however, in the reigns of the latter sovereigns of the Stuart family, a different rule prevailed, that a jury in such case might be discharged for the purpose of having better evidence against him at a future day; and this power was exercised for the benefit of the crown only; but it is a doctrine so abhorrent to every principle of safety and security that it ought not to receive the least countenance in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Tyson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API