State v. . Garrigues
Superior Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The rule as laid down in 3 Co. Inst., 110, and 1 Inst., 227, is general and without exception that a jury in a capital case cannot be discharged without giving a verdict. Afterwards, however, in the reigns of the latter sovereigns of the Stuart family, a different rule prevailed, that a jury in such case might be discharged for the purpose of having better evidence against him at a future day; and this power was exercised for the benefit of the crown only; but it is a doctrine so abhorrent to every principle of safety and security that it ought not to receive the least countenance in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. Tyson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.