Legal Opinion
Sealover v. Carey Canada
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1992No. CV-88-0643PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McCLURE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Alma M. Sealover and Donald E. Sealover filed this products liability ac tion against defendants W.R. Grace Company, (“W.R. Grace”), United States Gypsum Company (“U.S. Gypsum”) 1 among others. Plaintiffs alleged that as a result of Donald Sealover’s exposure to asbestos during his sojourn in the Merchant Marines and during his forty-year career as a carpenter, he contracted mesothelioma, 2 asbestosis and other asbestos-related diseases which ultimately led to his death on May 2, 1988. Alma Sealover, acting both individually and as…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Advanced Fluid Sys., Inc. v. Kevin Huber, Insysma (Integrated Sys. & Mach., LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- ACandS, Inc. v. AsnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Marshall Independent School District v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
- Morningstar v. Hoban, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2002