Dennis Johnson, Raymond Johnson v. State of Indiana

[24] The majority concludes that, because the recent revisions to the sentencing modification statute are neither remedial nor procedural, a prior version of the sentencing modification statute applies to the Johnsons’ petitions. I agree that the prior version of the statute applies in this case, but do so because of the time the Johnsons filed their petitions. I disagree that their dates of conviction and sentencing are controlling and therefore respectfully concur only in the result.

[25] On December 19, 2013, the John-sons each filed a request for reentry court evaluation,6 which, as the…