Legal Opinion

Sloan v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2011No. 18S04-1009-CR-502PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

We hold that once concealment has been established, statutes of limitations for criminal offenses are tolled under Indiana Code section 35-41-4-2(h) (2008) until a prosecuting authority becomes aware or should have become aware of sufficient evidence to charge the defendant. We also hold that under the facts of this case there was no double jeopardy violation because each challenged offense was established by separate and distinct facts.

Facts and Procedural History

M.A., the victim, was born on May 1, 1978. Jeffrey L. Sloan is M.A.’s step-uncle and is approximately…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spivey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. RendlemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Phelps Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Daniel Lee Pierce v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Brooks v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  4. Pardip Singh v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. N.L. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API