Legal Opinion
Osage Nation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 28, 2003No. 00-169 LPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, the Osage Nation and/or Tribe’ of Indians of Oklahoma (Osage or Tribe), seeks damages from defendant for breach of fiduciary duty in the mismanagement of tribal trust funds and for failure to account. Complaint (Compl.) H 4. Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment for lack of jurisdiction.1 See Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Def.’s Mot.) at 2. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.2
1. Background
In 1906, Congress…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Osage Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Round Valley Indian Tribes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.