State v. Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
State WaeeaNT beard on appeal from court of Mayor of Wilmington, before Bryan, J., at Eall Term, 1899, of Superior Court of New TIaNOVER County. Tbe defendant was charged with doing scavenger work without license, in violation of an ordinance regulating the sanitary department of the city of Wilmington. The defendant was convicted and fined $5 and costs, and appealed. Admitted facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This is a criminal action originally begun in the Mayor's Court of the city of Wilmington wherein the defendant is charged with doing “scavenger work for pay at the surface closet of W. S. Royster, without having license to do such scavenger work and not being employed by the licensed scavenger of tire city’’ of Wilmington. The closet is thereafter referred to as belonging to Neistle. The following ara tire admitted facts:
That in January, 1899, the defendant made a contract with William Niestle to do his scavenger* work for the term of one year by cleaning the closet at his store once a week…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Boehm v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Porter v. Suburban Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973