Legal Opinion

Kiler v. Wohletz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 15,558PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Atchison district court; Benjamin F. Hudson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This is an action of replevin, brought by the maker of a promissory note to recover possession of the' same from one claiming to hold it as a bona fide purchaser. The note was given by Frank Wohletz to J. H. McCann as a result of a lightning-rod transaction, in which it is alleged that McCann agreed to equip plaintiff’s house and barn with lightning-rods if plaintiff would pay for the joint and brace and seventy-five cents per foot for two feet of the rod and thereafter represent to other farmers that the rods cost him seventy-five…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dunham v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Whittaker v. Southwest Va. Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Minor v. FikeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Buck v. AxtIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Azzolina v. Order of the Sons of ItalySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. International Motor Rebuilding Co. v. United Motor Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Moore v. MarkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Producers Coal Co. v. Mifflin Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API