Legal Opinion

Sampaio v. Atlantic-Heydt, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 2, 2003No. 02 Civ. 1201(VM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

MARRERO, District Judge.

This diversity action arises from an unknown person’s prank at a construction site that caused plaintiff Gilmar Sampaio (“Sampaio”) to suffer a severe eye injury. Sampaio alleges that four companies connected to the construction at the site were negligent in failing to prevent the injury. On defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the Court concludes that Sampaio has not raised a genuine issue of material fact to establish that defendants breached a duty of care owed to Sampaio, or that defendants were otherwise negligent in connection with his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fung-Schwartz v. Cerner CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API