Legal Opinion
Holeman v. Neils
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 8, 1992No. CIV 90-0832 PHX CAMPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
Having considered the parties’ motions for summary judgment, the Court concludes as follows:
Background
Plaintiff has filed a twelve count complaint arising out of a real estate investment entered into by plaintiff and the two defendants for real property in Tucson, Arizona. Plaintiff seeks to recover his investment in the real property. Plaintiff has filed a motion for partial summary judgment on counts two, three, five, six and eleven and defendants have filed motions for summary judgment.
The following facts regarding the investment are undisputed: 1 On or about…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Haisch v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1996
- Statee ex rel. Miller v. Cutty's Des Moines Camping Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Waste Manufacturing & Leasing Corp. v. HambickiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.