Legal Opinion

Lunzer v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1929No. Appeal, 14PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This action grows out of a right-angle grade crossing collision between plaintiff’s automobile truck and defendant’s train, in which the truck was demolished and plaintiff injured. Appealing from the judgment entered against it on the verdict in plaintiff’s favor, defendant submits to us that no recovery should have been sanctioned by the court below because of appellee’s contributory negligence.

The public road upon which appellee was traveling crossed defendant’s tracks at grade about 900 feet from the crossing where the accident occurred. At this first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. ClothierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Cubitt v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Hepps v. Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Joseph v. Pitts. & W. v. Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Muehlhof v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kolich v. Monongahela Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Miller v. Penna. R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Kuntz v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Walker v. SternSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API