Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Foster
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 29, 1991No. 24974-6-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
Appellant Frances Kelly appeals the trial court's denial of her claim for attorney's fees. We affirm.
Facts
Frances Kelly was the niece of decedent Leo Virgil Hol-lowell and the sole beneficiary of his estate. The executor of the Hollowell estate was Kelly's father, Willard A. Kates, who was represented by attorney Herman Michelson up until the time of Michelson's death in September 1981. After that, Kates was represented by defendant William B. Foster. Michelson had office-sharing arrangements with defendants R. Scott Hutchison and Foster, and while they were not formal partners, they held…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hsu Ying Li v. TangWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. KottsickWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Perez v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Micro Enhancement v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Micro Enhancement International, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- VersusLaw, Inc. v. Stoel Rives, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Cotton v. KronenbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Cotton v. KronenbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.