Legal Opinion

Freed v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

I. Insufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict in appellee’s favor is not made a ground for reversal. All of the propositions relied upon for -reversal are based upon alleged errors committed by the court in its charge to the jury. Although appellee’s cause ^ ae^Qn jg aUege(J 0lie ground of. the petition, which was amended before, and again at the time of the trial, the court required her to elect whether she would proceed upon the allegations of seduction only, or upon her cause of action for the alleged breach of promise of marriage, with seduction as aggravation of damages. She…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rayburn v. Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Geiger v. PayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Lauer v. BanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Fletcher v. KetchamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rank v. KuhnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API