Legal Opinion

Auburn & Syracuse Electric Railroad v. Headley

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Suit for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

In a deed in which plaintiff’s predecessor is the grantee, and the lessor of the defendant is a successor to the grantor, is found the following clause: “ The premises above described are subject to the following reservation, easements, contracts and reservations; to-wit: The parties of the first part reserve from the premises aforesaid a street or highway running from the bridge that now crosses the new channel or outlet of the Owasco Lake at least three (3) rods wide, and extending from said bridge across said outlet to Owasco Street on the highway leading from Owasco Lake to the City of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Beardslee v. New Berlin Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Matter of LadueNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Potter v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. In re The City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanitary Appliance Co. v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Brearton v. Fina, New York County Courts1956
  3. Wood v. SimonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Israelsky v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Le Sawyer v. SquillaceNew York Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API